|
|
The transport equation for the intermittency
is defined as:
![]() |
(4.7-1) |
The transition sources are defined as follows:
where
is the strain rate magnitude.
is an empirical correlation that controls the length of the transition region. The destruction/relaminarization sources are defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7-3) |
where
is the vorticity magnitude. The transition onset is controlled by the following functions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7-4) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
(4.7-6) |
is the critical Reynolds number where the intermittency first starts to increase in the boundary layer. This occurs upstream of the transition Reynolds number
and the difference between the two must be obtained from an empirical correlation. Both the
and
correlations are functions of
.
The constants for the intermittency equation are:
Separation Induced Transition Correction
The modification for separation-induced transition is:
The model constants in Equation
4.7-7 have been adjusted from those of Menter et al. [
226] in order to improve the predictions of separated flow transition. The main difference is that the constant that controls the relation between
and
was changed from 2.193, its value for a Blasius boundary layer, to 3.235, the value at a separation point where the shape factor is 3.5 [
226]. The boundary condition for
at a wall is zero normal flux, while for an inlet,
is equal to 1.0.
The transport equation for the transition momentum thickness Reynolds number
is
![]() |
(4.7-8) |
The source term is defined as follows:
![]() |
(4.7-10) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
(4.7-11) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
(4.7-12) |
The model constants for the
equation are:
The boundary condition for
at a wall is zero flux. The boundary condition for
at an inlet should be calculated from the empirical correlation based on the inlet turbulence intensity.
The model contains three empirical correlations.
is the transition onset as observed in experiments. This has been modified from Menter et al. [
226] in order to improve the predictions for natural transition. It is used in Equation
4.7-9.
is the length of the transition zone and is substituted in Equation
4.7-2.
is the point where the model is activated in order to match both
and
, and is used in Equation
4.7-5. At present, these empirical correlations are proprietary and are not given in this manual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7-13) |
The first empirical correlation is a function of the local turbulence intensity,
, and the Thwaites' pressure gradient coefficient
is defined as
|
|
(4.7-14) |
where
is the acceleration in the streamwise direction.
Coupling the Transition Model and SST Transport Equations
The transition model interacts with the SST turbulence model, as follows:
![]() |
(4.7-15) |
|
|
(4.7-16) |
|
|
(4.7-17) |
![]() |
(4.7-18) |
|
|
(4.7-19) |
|
|
(4.7-20) |
where
and
are the original production and destruction terms for the SST model and
is the original SST blending function. Note that the production term in the
-equation is not modified. The rationale behind the above model formulation is given in detail in Menter et al. [
226].
In order to capture the laminar and transitional boundary layers correctly, the mesh must have a
of approximately one. If the
is too large (i.e.
5), then the transition onset location moves upstream with increasing
. It is recommended to use the bounded second order upwind based discretization for the mean flow, turbulence and transition equations.