Other things

italian

Optical Illusions

The rotating dancer: the rotation direction is undefined!

The original site for the famous rotating dancer seems to be: http://www.procreo.jp/labo/labo13.html from the "Flash Laboratory" http://www.procreo.jp/labo.html
People see the dancer rotate clockwise or counter clockwise and the direction can also change in an apparent random way.

The animated GIF has invaded the web even down to Australia:
http://www.news.com.au:80/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22556281-661,00.html

into You Tube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFV6h6MXQ

New Scientist:
http://www.newscientist.com/blog/shortsharpscience/2007/10/bring-on-dancing-girl.html

or the Richard Dawkins site:
http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=26222&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

A similar animation is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MIP-mouse.gif


Back to the rotating dancer: rotating dancer Some suggestions to understand the effect:

Looking to the images it can be noted that each of them can be interpreted in two different and equivalent ways.
For example in the image number 3, the dancer can bee seen as standing on her right leg, 3/4 frontside or standing on her left leg, 3/4 backside.
http://www.afs.enea.it/bracco/varie/allframes/569317100_frame_003.bmp

It's an effect analogous to the static Necker cube
 (for example http://www.pbs.org/wnet/brain/illusions/form2.html or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_illusion, see Ambiguous illusions)

The vision mechanism in the brain apparently is able to lock into one of the two possible interpretations and remain locked until some discrepancy is detected, so that the other interpretation is selected.

If the interpretation is the one with the left leg standing the flux of visual information is interpreted as a clockwise rotating dancer while in the other case of the right leg, the returned rotation is in the opposite direction.

Someone has noticed that the transition bewteen the two different interpretations can be triggered by fixing the observation on the feets. Indeed, by looking at the single images, it can be noted that there are cases where the feet positions are not equivalent for the two interpretations. The artist has been really smart but some of the situations have really no compatible solutions for the feet.

Others have remarked that also an oscillating solution can be observed and probably is related to the capacity of some observers to elaborate in a much faster way the image flux.

To test if the described interpretation can be the correct one, I have produced two slightly modified version of the animated GIF, by adding only two white pixels in each of the images and the pixel location has been chosen so that only one of the two interpretation is the coherent one.

I have called them:


 
clockwise stabilized counter-clockwise stabilized
Clockwise stabilized Counter-clockwise stabilized
   

A test with colleagues and friends shows that the stabilization work mostly but not always, as someone seems to see the white spots sliding on the back of the dancer.


22/11/2007  Giovanni Bracco Home page